Category Archives: WONS

Faith Like Fire and Faith Like Water

Of the people who put faith in the Lotus Sūtra today, some have faith like fire while others have it like water. Those who have faith like fire refer to those who become enthusiastic upon listening to the preaching but their passion cools down as times goes by, and eventually forget the teaching. On the other hand, those whose faith is like water mean those whose faith is like a ceaselessly flowing water, namely those who retain their faith without retreating.

Ueno-dono Gohenji, A Reply to Lord Ueno, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Faith and Practice, Volume 4, Page 126

In Order to Study and Propagate the Dharma of Buddhism

In order to study and propagate the dharma of Buddhism, it is indispensable to know the difference between Mahāyāna and Hinayāna teachings, provisional and true teachings, and exoteric and esoteric teachings among the various sūtras. In addition, it is also necessary to know the proper time for propagating the teaching, and the capacity for learning of those who are to receive the teaching. Nevertheless, most people in Japan automatically recite the Amitābha Sūtra, chanting “Namu Amida-butsu” devoutly, but thinking little of the Lotus Sūtra.

Many, who are respected for being wise, seem to think that they know the proper time for propagation and the capacity of the people, but actually they believe in the insignificant rather than the significant, believing in the provisional sūtras, while casting aside the true sūtras. Just as the insignificant may become a great evil, a medicine changes to poison, and close relatives become sworn enemies, it is impossible to save such people.

Even those who excel in understanding Buddhism, if they don’t grasp the social conditions of the time, the capacity of the people to receive the teaching, the conditions of the country, and the order of the teachings to be spread, they will not obtain the expected results no matter how hard they work to propagate the teachings. For example, it may be permissible to propagate Mahāyāna teachings in an absolute Hinayāna country, but to propagate Hinayāna teachings in the absolute Mahāyāna country must definitely be avoided. If Hinayāna teachings are forcibly propagated in the country of Mahāyāna Buddhism, disasters will befall the country and the people fall into evil realms.

Shimoyama Goshōsoku, The Shimoyama Letter, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Volume 5, Page 66-67

The Reason Why the Lotus Sūtra Is Called ‘Myō’

Generally speaking, there are 4 kinds of people who cannot attain Buddhahood or enter the Buddha land. The first is the Two Vehicles with fixed natures namely pratyekabuddha and śrāvaka. Next is the icchantika, who did not listen to the teaching of the Buddha and spoiled the seed of Buddhahood. The third is those with empty mind who do not believe in the doctrine of cause and effect expounded by the Buddha. And finally those who slander the True Dharma. These people, who have long been denied the attainment of Buddhahood in the various pre-Lotus sūtras, were allowed to become Buddhas for the first time in the Lotus Sūtra. This is the reason why the Lotus Sūtra is called “myō.”

Hokke Daimoku Shō, Treatise on the Daimoku of the Lotus Sūtra, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Faith and Practice, Volume 4, Page 42-43

Only the Lotus Sūtra Reveals True Meaning of pre-Lotus sūtras

[I]t is against the will of the Buddha to interpret the pre-Lotus sūtras according to the words of those sūtras. This is so because, as stated in the third fascicle of the Annotations on the Words and Phrases of the Lotus Sūtra, the whole truth is not revealed in the pre-Lotus sūtras. It is further said in the tenth fascicle of the Commentary on the Profound Meaning of the Lotus Sūtra that only the Lotus Sūtra reveals the true meaning of the pre-Lotus as well as the meaning of the Lotus Sūtra, the sole purpose of the Buddha appearing in this world.

Nijō Sabutsu Ji, Obtaining Buddhahood by the Two Vehicles, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 3, Page 228

Facial Expression of the Ten Realms

QUESTION: I do not dare question what the Lotus Sūtra says and how T’ien-t’ai and his disciple Chang-an interpreted it regarding the “mutual possession of ten realms.” However, they sound as though they are calling fire, “water,” and black, “white.” It is hard to understand although I believe this is what the Buddha preached. Now, no matter how many times we look at each other’s faces, we see only a human being, not anything of other realms. It is the same with our own face. How is it possible to believe in the “mutual possession of the ten realms” doctrine?

ANSWER: As we often look at each other’s faces, we notice our facial expression changes from time to time. It is full of delight, anger, or calm sometimes; but other times it changes to greed, ignorance, or flattery. Anger represents hells; greed—hungry spirits; ignorance—beasts; flattery—asura demons; delight—gods; and calm—men. Thus, we see in the countenance of people six realms of illusion, from hells to the realm of gods. We cannot see four realms of holy ones (śrāvaka, pratyekabuddha, bodhisattvas, and Buddhas), which are hidden from our eyes. Nevertheless, we must be able to see them, too, if we look for them carefully.

Kanjin Honzon-shō, A Treatise Revealing the Spiritual Contemplation and the Most Verable One, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 2, Page 134-135

Merits of Giving Alms to Practicer of the Lotus Sūtra

It is preached in the “Teacher of the Dharma” chapter of the Lotus Sūtra, fascicle 4: “Suppose a person in search of the Buddha Way comes before me with his hands pressed together in prayer before Me and praises Me for as long as a kalpa (aeon) with numerous verses. Such a person will gain innumerable blessings. A person who glorifies an upholder of this sūtra will gain even more blessings.” This scriptural statement means that the merit of giving alms to a less intelligent practicer of the Lotus Sūtra in the Latter Age of Degeneration who is about to die of starvation is superior to the merit of supporting the Lord Preacher Śākyamuni Buddha for the period of one kalpa.

Matsuno-dono Goshōsoku, Letter to Lord Matsuno, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Volume 7, Followers II, Page 66

Daigaku Seson

To begin with, our Lord Preacher Śākyamuni Buddha is called Daigaku Seson (Greatly Enlightened World-Honored One). The Chinese character son of “Seson” means takashi (high), and it also means kō (filial piety). As Śākyamuni Buddha is the most filial of all dutiful children, He is called the World-Honored One. Śākyamuni Buddha has a golden body, and is equipped with 32 marks of physical excellence. One of His 32 marks is that no one can see the top of His head. The Buddha is 16 feet tall, but when non-Buddhists with bamboo sticks tried to measure His height with a 16-foot long bamboo stick, it was in vain. Even King of Brahma Heaven cannot see the top of His head. This is such an inexplicable physical mark of the Buddha. Why is the Buddha equipped with such an excellent mark as this? It is because He is a great being who is foremost in filial piety.

Hōren-shō, Letter to Hōren, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Volume 6, Followers I, Page 50-51

Merits of Offerings to the Lotus Sūtra

There once lived a king called the Great King Aśoka, who ruled one-quarter of the world. Accompanied by the Dragon King, King Aśoka could cause it to rain as he wished, and he was also attended to by demons. An evil king at first, King Aśoka later converted to Buddhism, gave alms to Buddhist priests as many as 60,000 each day, and built stone pagodas, 84,000 in number.

When we look at the previous life of this Great King, we note that during the Buddha’s lifetime there were two boys named Tokushō and Mushō. One day, when the Buddha was passing by, the two made a “rice cake” from mud, and offered it to Him. Due to this sincere offering to the Buddha, one of the two was reborn as the Great King Aśoka 200 years later.

The Buddha is great, but compared to the Lotus Sūtra He is like the light of a firefly, in front of the sun and moon. When compared in terms of height, the Buddha is like the earth while the Lotus Sūtra reaches the heavens. If making offerings to the Buddha has such great merit, how much more so does one gain by making offerings to the Lotus Sūtra.

The two boys received such a wonderful benefit from the Buddha despite their seemingly insignificant acts. How much more benefit will you receive for your various offerings to the Lotus Sūtra! Moreover, when Tokushō and Mushō made their offerings to the Buddha, it was not during a time of famine while we are now suffering from famine. Hence your gifts at this time are even more precious than the gifts of the two small boys.

From this point of view, how can Śākyamuni Buddha, the Buddha of Many Treasures, and the ten female rākṣasa demons neglect to protect you who made offerings to the Lotus Sūtra?

Ueno-dono Gohenji, A Reply to Lord Ueno, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Faith and Practice, Volume 4, Page 125-126

The Essence of the Lotus Sūtra: Myō, Hō, Ren, Ge, and Kyō

These four great bodhisattvas were like the four wise men of Shang-Shan. Appearing in the Lotus assemblies, they glorified Śākyamuni Buddha, the Buddha of Many Treasures and Buddhas in manifestation, and they knocked down the proud banners of slanderers of the True Dharma just as the gale winds blow away twigs. Attendees of the assemblies showed respect to them as if heavenly beings obeyed Indra. Devadatta, who had struck Śākyamuni Buddha, pressed his palms together to express heartfelt respect to them; and Kokālika, who had lied to present himself as innocent and slandered Śāriputra, prostrated to repent his past sins. Great bodhisattvas like Mañjuśrī were ashamed of themselves and speechless, while Hinayāna sages like Śāriputra silently bowed.

Then the Enlightened and World Honored One, Śākyamuni Buddha, expounded “The Life Span of the Buddha” chapter and entrusted the four great bodhisattvas with the task of transmitting it after displaying the ten kinds of divine powers in “The Divine Powers of the Buddha” chapter. What was the dharma that was entrusted to them? Reducing the whole of the Lotus Sūtra, we produce its condensed form. By reducing this condensed form further we get the essence of the Lotus Sūtra: the five Chinese characters of myō, hō, ren, ge, and kyō, in which the Five Profound Meanings of the Lotus Sūtra—its name, entity, quality, function and teaching—are all contained. For instance, this is like Chiu Pao-yüan who selected the horse not by the color of its hair but its speed of running, and Shih T’ao-lin who concentrated on grasping the gist of Buddhist teachings while discarding the particulars in lecturing on the sūtras.

Soya Nyūdō-dono-gari Gosho, A Letter to Lay Priest Lord Soya, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 3, Pages 159.

If Easy to Believe, the Sūtra Is Not the True Dharma

After all, those with capacity to understand and have full faith in Buddhism who had the luck of listening to Śākyamuni Buddha preach the Lotus Sūtra in India must have accumulated a great deal of merit in their past lives. Moreover, they were fortunate to have been assisted and guided by the Lord Śākyamuni Buddha, the Buddha of Many Treasures, who had come to attest to the truth of Śākyamuni’s words, various Buddhas in manifestation who had come from all over the universe, numerous bodhisattvas who had sprung up from underground, and such distinguished disciples of Śākyamuni Buddha as Mañjuśrī and Maitreya. Nevertheless, there were some who were not converted to the Lotus Sūtra. This is the reason why those self-conceited, as many as 5,000, moved out when the Buddha was about to start preaching (chapter 2, “Expedients”), and why some men and gods were transferred to other worlds (chapter 11, “The Appearance of the Stupa of Treasures”). It was so even while Śākyamuni Buddha was alive. How much more difficult is it to believe in the Lotus Sūtra in the Ages of the True Dharma and Semblance Dharma after the death of Śākyamuni Buddha, not to say in the beginning of the Latter Age of Degeneration? If you could easily believe in the sūtra, it would mean that the sūtra is not the True Dharma.

Kanjin Honzon-shō, A Treatise Revealing the Spiritual Contemplation and the Most Verable One, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 2, Page 134