Category Archives: Tao-Sheng Commentary

Tao-sheng’s Commentary on the Lotus Sūtra

tao-sheng-commentary-bookcover
Available from SUNY Press

Young-ho Kim, a student of philosophy at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, published his doctoral thesis “Tao-sheng’s Commentary on the Saddharmapuṇḍarīka Sūtra: A Study and Translation” in May 1985. The State University of New York Press published Kim’s work as “Tao-sheng’s Commentary on the Lotus Sūtra” in 1990 as part of a SUNY series in Buddhist Studies. At the time of SUNY’s publication, Kim was an Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Inha University in Korea.

For my purposes, I’ll leave the spelling as Tao-sheng, which is the Wade-Giles spelling. The modern spelling is Daosheng.

SUNY’s teaser for the book says:

(Chu) Tao-sheng stands out in history as a unique and preeminent thinker whose paradigmatic, original ideas paved the way for the advent of Chinese Buddhism. The universality of Buddha-nature, which Tao-sheng championed at the cost of excommunication, was to become a cornerstone of the Chinese Buddhist ideology. This book presents a comprehensive study of the only complete document by Tao-sheng still in existence.

The importance of Tao-sheng’s work is underlined by Yoshiro Tamura in his Introduction to the Lotus Sutra. He writes:

When we look at the Lotus Sutra in light of its final form, we can see the merit of the traditional division of the sutra into two halves between chapters fourteen and fifteen. Daosheng, (355-434), a disciple of Kumarajiva who participated in the translation of sutras, made this division for the first time. Soon after the translation of the Lotus Sutra was finished, he wrote a commentary on it—the first in China, or at least the first that we still have.

Daosheng divided the Lotus Sutra into two parts, according to the teachings of cause and effect. That is, the section from chapters 1 through 14 he defined as that which “explicates the three causes and makes them one cause,” and the section from chapters 15 through 21 he defined as that which “speaks of three effects and makes them one effect.” In addition, the remaining chapters were interpreted as that which “makes three kinds of people equal and makes them one.” Here, “three” signifies the three vehicles and “one” signifies the one vehicle.

On the other hand, Daosheng established the idea of four kinds of Dharma wheel: the good and pure Dharma wheel (general religious thought), the Dharma wheel of skillful means (Buddhist upaya), the true Dharma wheel (true Buddhist thought), and the perfect Dharma wheel (ultimate Buddhist thought). The true Dharma wheel is what reveals the truth of the one vehicle, while the perfect Dharma wheel reveals the everlasting life (the Buddha). The teaching of cause, chapters 1-14, corresponds to the true Dharma wheel, while the teaching of effect, chapters 15-21, corresponds to the perfect wheel of Dharma. The remaining chapters are the dissemination or applied part of the sutra.

Yoshiro Tamura, "Introduction to the Lotus Sutra", p65-66

As Tamura points out, Tao-sheng’s commentary played an important role in Tiāntái Zhiyi’s understanding of the Lotus Sutra:

Zhiyi found material for his interpretation of the Lotus Sutra in Daosheng’s Commentary on the Lotus Sutra. While Kumarajiva and his disciples were translating sutras and commentaries they often discussed them with each other and even sought to write commentaries on them. It seems that they set out to write such commentaries on the Lotus Sutra, but of the commentaries written by Kumarajiva’s disciples only Daosheng’s has survived. In any case, of the extant Chinese commentaries on the Lotus Sutra, his is the earliest, making it especially important.

In it Daosheng ponders the title of the Lotus Sutra—Wonderful Dharma Lotus Flower Sutra. In particular, he interprets “Wonderful Dharma” as being the truth that is without shape or sound, and beyond all thought. He understands “Lotus Flower” as including both fruit and blossoms, symbolizing the idea that where there are causes there are effects. This leads him to comment that the pairing of “Lotus Flower” and “Wonderful Dharma” signifies that the Lotus Sutra is the Dharma of wonderful cause and wonderful effect. As mentioned earlier, the sutra has been divided into two halves on the basis of cause and effect.

The law of cause and effect is a law that refers to actual existence. The fact that it is picked out here has to do with the spirit of respect for the concrete and the practical that is generally found in China.

Yoshiro Tamura, "Introduction to the Lotus Sutra", p111

I will be publishing quotes from Kim’s discussion of Tao-sheng and his Commentary on the Lotus Sūtra and incorporating Tao-sheng’s commentary into my annotations of the Lotus Sūtra.

Next: The Meaning of Li

Tao-sheng: Words Without Discrepancy

My words are not false.

li is the sole ultimate. The [Buddha’s] words tally with li. Hence, it is said, “words are without discrepancy.”

Tao-sheng Commentary on the Lotus Sutra, p190

Tao-sheng: Strong in the Power of Faith

The Dharma cannot be shown.
It is inexplicable by words.
No one can understand it
Except the Buddhas
And the Bodhisattvas
Who are strong in the power of faith.

The Buddha earlier preached the three, but now he says that there are no [three], not yet, however, entering the track of the One. This idea is hard to fathom. Those who fathom it are few. Hence, those [whose faith is firm] are widely listed. Those [whose faith] is firm refer to those who are in the eighth stage (bhūmi) or beyond. Only they can fathom that the Buddha is about to preach the One Vehicle. Hence, it is said, “except for.” Those of the two vehicles hold on but cannot fathom it.

Tao-sheng Commentary on the Lotus Sutra, p189-190

Tao-sheng: These Eleven Factors

Only the Buddhas attained [the highest Truth, that is,] the reality of all things’ in regard to their appearances as such, their natures as such, their entities as such, their powers as such, their activities as such, their primary causes as such, their environmental causes as such, their effects as such, their rewards and retributions as such, and their equality as such [despite these differences].

There is no counterfeit (facade) of the two vehicles any more. Only the One Vehicle is real.

These eleven factors [qualified by such] represent myriad goodnesses. As smoke is the external mark (hsiang) of fire, burning is its nature. The external mark is based on the outside whereas nature is in charge of the inside.

[Such substance] is an integrated designation encompassing nature and mark.

When one has an ability not yet harnessed it is called power. That which creates an actual use and makes application possible is referred to as function.

That which enables [something] to come into existence is its “cause” (yin/hetu); that which helps [something] grow exuberantly like the branches and leaves of a tree is its “condition” (yüan/pratyaya)

When what one has willed and expected to happen duly come true, we call it effect. What is yielded from what one has seeded is called retribution.

The start of myriad goodnesses is the “end”; the culmination of the Buddha’s wisdom is the “beginning.” Only the Buddhas comprehend those meanings, and understand the ultimate source. Hence. in general conclusion, it is said, “the ultimate identity.”

Tao-sheng Commentary on the Lotus Sutra, p189

Tao-sheng: ‘We Need Speak No More’

No more [cease], Śāriputra, will I say because the Dharma attained by the Buddhas is the highest Truth, rare [to hear] and difficult to understand.

Because it already has been declared that the three vehicles are not real, what should logically follow is an explication of the One Vehicle. Even though [the Buddha] has said that they are unreal, this is still short of what is proper, not yet sufficient to startle their minds from attachment to them. If he says it again, they are certain to be bewildered and puzzled. Hence, he shouts, saying, “cease.” How could one argue that their puzzlement can be dispelled without speaking. Although the One has not yet been pinpointed, the idea has been roughly Suggested. Hence, he says, “we need speak no more.”

Tao-sheng Commentary on the Lotus Sutra, p188

Tao-sheng: Gladdening Many Hearts

The Tathāgatas divide [the Dharma] into various teachings, and expound those teachings to all living beings so skillfully and with such gentle voices that living beings are delighted.

It has been stated already that [the Buddha’s teaching methods are] without set patterns, although this statement appears contradictory to [the nature of] li, [which has to do with the One]. It is necessary to explain again the differences between the three vehicles, of which he says here, a variety of. By means of three, One is manifested and this is called skillful preaching. His myriad statements are equally proper; there is no differing taste (rasa); [all] are in accord with it (the One), and there is nothing that goes against it, thus it is called gladdening many hearts. So far [the Buddha] has explicated internal comprehension; now here he talks about external conversion.

Tao-sheng Commentary on the Lotus Sutra, p188

Tao-sheng: The Consummation of Expedient Devices

The insight of the Tathāgatas is wide and deep. [The Tathāgatas] have all the [states of mind towards] innumerable [living beings,] unhindered [eloquence,] powers, fearlessness, dhyāna-concentrations, emancipations, and samādhis. They entered deep into boundlessness, and attained the Dharma which you have never heard before.

Internally, [the Buddha] has consummated “expedient devices, knowledge and insight”; externally, he speaks with ‘skillful measures applicable to all human situations.'” Explained again is the reason why he has consummated expedient devices; namely, because his illumination is perfect, without obstruction, and has reached the ultimate end. [The statement] that his “dhyāna concentration” and his meritorious virtues “have deeply penetrated the limitless” explains the reason why his “knowledge and insight, and his pāramitās have [all] been acquired to the fullest measure.”

Tao-sheng Commentary on the Lotus Sutra, p188

Tao Sheng: The Wisdom of the Buddha

[Their wisdom] cannot be understood by any Śrāvaka or Pratyekabuddha because the [present] Buddhas attended on many hundreds of thousands of billions of [past] Buddhas, and practiced the innumerable teachings of those Buddhas bravely and strenuously to their far-flung fame until they attained the profound Dharma which you have never heard before, [and became Buddhas,] and also because [since they became Buddhas] they have been expounding the Dharma according to the capacities of all living beings in such various ways that the true purpose of their [various] teachings is difficult to understand.

But then the three vehicles are all provisional exigencies (ch’üan). And the Greater Vehicle does not contradict that by which it becomes great. Therefore, [the Buddha] does not mention it, [the Greater Vehicle]. The two vehicles are in diametrical opposition to the sphere of “great.” This refers to [what they] “cannot know.”

[…they attained the profound Dharma which you have never heard before…]
If the reason why this is so is not explained, how can one believe it? [The Buddha] had to make repeated explanations. Accumulating [what he was supposed] to do in such a way, [“in former times the Buddha”] attained to the ultimate [achievement]; that is what is meant by “that had never been before.” [The phrase stating that the Buddha’s wisdom is] incalculable conjoins with the [next] phrase with the word wisdom. This thus explains effect by means of cause.

[…they have been expounding the Dharma according to the capacities of all living beings…]
Words and traces represent external compliance [with li or reality]. By following the traces one might overlook the meaning. Being ignorant of the meaning, one encounters difficulty in understanding [what is real]. This [phrase] joins with the phrase the gateways of their wisdom. Now that the reason has been explained, the subtle meaning will reveal its face (literally, “turn its head”).

Tao-sheng Commentary on the Lotus Sutra, p187

Tao-sheng: Casting Aside Encumbrances

Since I became a Buddha, I [also] have been expounding various teachings with various stories of previous lives, with various parables, and with various similes. I have been leading all living beings with innumerable expedients in order to save them from various attachments, because I have the power to employ expedients and the power to perform the pāramitā of insight.
What has been stated so far is all about praising the Buddha’s wisdom. The present statement is the direct recounting of what Śākyamuni says he did himself. Entitling the [present] chapter (“Expedient Devices”) has yielded this phrase. The preceding words, accords with what is appropriate, may then be seen as bringing “encumbrances”; it is necessary thus to explain this again. [The Buddha] said “[what he preaches] accords with what is appropriate,” in the sense that “in accordance with” the kind of disease there should be “what is appropriate.” Diseases are myriad in kind. [By the same token] the teaching cannot be in a set pattern; but its fundamental purpose is to lead [beings] to cast aside their “encumbrances.” Otherwise [even] for a day, their “encumbrances” would not be loosened from (or “abandon”) li. Hence, he said, “since achieving Buddhahood.”

Tao-sheng Commentary on the Lotus Sutra, p187

Tao-sheng: Something Hard to Understand

The gate to it is difficult to understand and difficult to enter.

[The value of] wisdom consists in preaching. Preaching is what the gateways refer to. Not only is wisdom incomprehensible but the “gateways” also are hard to fathom. Fathoming the “gateways” means realizing that there are no three [vehicles]. Is not this something that is “hard to understand?”

Tao-sheng: The Buddha’s Intent

“The wisdom of the [present] Buddhas is profound and immeasurable.

Although [the Buddha’s] speeches are varied in myriad ways, yet the intent [of the words] lies in manifesting the One. When beings deviate from the import of the words, creating a “profound [chasm]” with respect to “wisdom,” it is not because the “wisdom” [as such] is “profound,” but merely because the beings themselves are far away (literally, “profound”) from “wisdom. ” This expression laments the failure [of beings in reaching the Buddha’s intent]. How can this be taken as a praise for “wisdom”?

Tao-sheng Commentary on the Lotus Sutra, p186