Over the past few months I’ve been reading books about Bodhisattvas and the Six Perfections from Zen authors, books on the basics of Buddhism and introductions to the Lotus Sutra by authors outside Nichiren Shu. On my to-read pile are books on T’ien-Tai philosophy and the Establishment of the Japanese Tendai School, two volumes of dharma talks by the Most Venerable Nichidatsu Fujii and, for good measure, the Vimalakirti Sutra.
This is all part of my effort to follow Nichiren’s admonition: “Strive to carry out the two ways of practice and learning. Without practice and learning, Buddhism will cease to exist.” (Shohō Jissō Shō, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Volume 4 p.79)
But I realize I need to circle back and ensure my foundation in Nichiren Buddhism is sound. I’m reading the Lotus Sutra daily but I haven’t re-read Nichiren’s letters recently.
Today, March 1, I’m starting a 100-day study of Nichiren’s writings that will continue daily through June 9.
I would like to think that I do this in the spirit of “The Best Way for Recompensing Indebtedness,” which comes from Nichiren’s essay on gratitude:
“What is the best way for Buddhists to express their gratitude for the unfathomable kindness that they have received? Mastering Buddhism completely and to be sagacious is the way. How can anyone guide blind persons across a bridge, if he himself is blind? How can a captain, who does not know the direction of the wind, sail his ship to transport many merchants to a mountain of treasure?”
At this point I need to confess that I actually started this on Feb. 26. I’m sort of rounding up so I can start at the beginning of the month. Who starts stuff at the end of the month?
The need for my study was actually underlined for me when I was reading Jisshō-shō — A Treatise on the Ten Chapters of the Great Concentration and Insight — written in Kamakura in 1271.
Nichiren writes:
“Non-Buddhist religions in India claimed that this world was eternal, joyful, free and pure. On the contrary, the Buddha insisted that this world was impermanent, painful, empty and egoless in order to destroy their superficial views. The Two Vehicles (two kinds of Buddhist known as śrāvaka and pratyekabuddha) were stuck to the principle of emptiness preached by the Buddha and could not grasp the idea of eternity in Mahayana Buddhism. The Buddha, therefore, reproached them saying that even the five rebellious sins and evil passions could be a cause of enlightenment, but their inflexible belief in emptiness will never lead them to Buddhahood.” (Writings of Nichiren Shonin, Doctrine 2, Page 5.)
Having just finished two Zen-focused books explaining emptiness, I’m intrigued by Nichiren’s “idea of eternity in Mahayana Buddhism.” What is that? Is there something more than Chapter 16’s assurance that Śākyamuni’s lifespan is immeasurable – not eternal but immeasurable?