Category Archives: Blog

Tsuito-e and New Year Party

Richard, Alexis and Mary enjoying their luncheon bento boxes.

Turned this year’s Sacramento Nichiren Buddhist Church’s Tsuito-e service and New Year Party into a family affair. The Tsuito-e service is a memorial service for deceased members marking an everlasting membership in a community of believers. This is followed with the New Year Party put on by the Fujinkai (women’s group). The luncheon acts as a Fujinkai fund-raiser and as an opportunity to thank those who helped out in the various church activities during the previous year.

This was apparently the first time my wife attended the luncheon and certainly the first time my son and his girlfriend attended. Perhaps we can make this into a family tradition.

Ven. Kenjo Igarashi accompanied his sermon with a chart illustrating the 10 worlds possessing the 10 worlds.

Ven. Kenjo Igarashi used the opportunity of the large crowd at the service to offer a quick overview of Ichinen Sanzen, a shorter version of the lecture he gave last year on The Logic of 3000 Realms.

Nichiren Buddhist Sangha in Oakland practice/discussion Sunday 13th

Altar in Mark Herrick’s Piedmont home where the Oakland Sangha meets
Heading back to Sacramento, having taken Amtrak to Oakland to attend the “Nichiren Buddhist Sangha in Oakland practice/discussion Sunday 13th.” The traditional Nichiren Shu service and discussion meeting was held in the Piedmont home of Mark Herrick. While not as convenient as last November’s service at the Bay Area Thelemic Temple across from the Lake Merritt BART station, it was no trouble getting a Lyft ride to and from the Oakland Jack London Amtrak station.

I would like to find a way to fit regular trips into my practice since I really appreciate the opportunity to take part in Ryuei McCormick’s discussions on Buddhism.

Amtrak waiting to return to Sacramento

Daily Gosho

Beginning this morning and continuing for the next four years or so I’ll be publishing a quote each day from the Writings of Nichiren Shōnin. As with this site in general, the purpose here is to provide a place to store things I’ve found useful for later recall.

As I begin I’m reminded of the opening to Śāntideva’s A Guide to the Buddhist Path to Awakening:

2 Nothing new will be said here, nor have I any skill in composition. Therefore I do not imagine that I can benefit others. I have done this to perfume my own mind.

3 While doing this, the surge of my inspiration to cultivate what is skillful increases. Moreover, should another, of the very same humors as me, also look at this, then he too may benefit from it.

The quotes from Nichiren’s writings were gathered during last year’s 100 Days of Study project with intention of eventually publishing them. Some quotes are short but many are substantial.

My goal is to give myself something to ponder each day, something to perfume my own mind.

The Need for Study

I recently completed reading Santideva’s The Bodhicaryavatara: A Guide to the Buddhist Path to Awakening. This book was the subject of the Nichiren Shu service and lecture put on my Rev. Ryuei McCormick in Oakland that I attended on Nov. 25. I’ve already used portions from the introduction to help illuminate some of what I’m learning. (See this post.)

I have more than 200 quotes from the Bodhicaryavatara that I consider inspiring and worth taking the time to input into this website so that I can easily access them, perhaps having them randomly appear in order to prompt consideration of these Mahāyāna ideals.

But as I consider this I wonder whether it can be done without distracting from my primary practice of reciting the Lotus Sūtra and chanting Namu Myōhō Renge Kyō.

As it happens, I am preparing to start publishing daily quotations from Nichiren’s writings as published by Nichiren Shū. I gathered the quotes during my “100 Days of Study.” In introducing that project I mentioned:

“Over the past few months I’ve been reading books about Bodhisattvas and the Six Perfections from Zen authors, books on the basics of Buddhism and introductions to the Lotus Sutra by authors outside Nichiren Shu. On my to-read pile are books on T’ien-Tai philosophy and the Establishment of the Japanese Tendai School, two volumes of dharma talks by the Most Venerable Nichidatsu Fujii and, for good measure, the Vimalakirti Sutra.

“This is all part of my effort to follow Nichiren’s admonition: “Strive to carry out the two ways of practice and learning. Without practice and learning, Buddhism will cease to exist.” (Shohō Jissō Shō, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Volume 4 p.79)”

This blog post was prompted by quotes from two of Nichiren’s letters. These quotes underline my dilemma, illustrating both the need for study and the danger from study.

The Need

The Lotus Sūtra of the fifth period consists of one fascicle of the Sūtra of Infinite Meaning as an introduction, eight fascicles of the Lotus Sūtra, and one fascicle of the Sūtra of Meditation on the Universal Sage Bodhisattva as the conclusion, bringing the total number of fascicles to ten.

The reason for my commentaries on the Four Teachings (Tripiṭaka, Common, Distinct, and Perfect) and the Four Periods (Flower Garland, Agama, Expanded, and Wisdom) is to help others learn what the Lotus Sūtra is. For one cannot correctly understand the teaching of the Lotus Sūtra without learning the pre-Lotus Sūtras, although one may study the pre-Lotus Sūtras without learning about other Sūtras.

In support of this, Grand Master T’ien-t’ai stated in his Profound Meaning of the Lotus Sūtra, “When attempting to spread various sūtras other than the Lotus Sūtra, the essential part of the teaching will not be lost even if a doctrinal analysis of all the teachings of the Buddha is not rendered. When attempting to spread the Lotus Sūtra, however, the essence of the teaching may be lost if a doctrinal analysis is not made.” It is preached in the Lotus Sūtra (chapter 2, “Expedients”), “Although the Buddhas expound various teachings, it is for the purpose of leading the people into the world of the One Buddha Vehicle.” “Various teachings” here refer to all the pre-Lotus Sūtras. “For the purpose of leading the people into the world of the One Buddha Vehicle” means to expound all the scriptures of Buddhism to reveal the Lotus Sūtra.

Ichidai Shōgyō Tai-I, Outline of All the Holy Teachings of the Buddha, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 3, Page 81

Underscore For one cannot correctly understand the teaching of the Lotus Sūtra without learning the pre-Lotus Sūtras.

The Danger

[A]bsolute subtlety (zetsudaimyō) is a doctrine of revealing the truth (single path to enlightenment) and merging all the provisional teachings for bodhisattvas, pratyekabuddha, and śrāvaka (kaie). Here the pre-Lotus sūtras, which are abandoned as expedient by the doctrine of relative subtlety (sōdaimyō), are all included in the ocean of the Lotus Sūtra. Once entering the ocean of the Lotus Sūtra, the pre-Lotus sūtras will no longer be dismissed as expedient. All the sūtras entering the ocean of the Lotus Sūtra take up the one flavor of Namu Myōhō Renge Kyō because of the wonderful merit of the ocean of the Lotus Sūtra. There is no reason why they have to be referred to by other names such as nembutsu, Ritsu, Shingon, or Zen. Consequently, Grand Master T’ien-t’ai said in his Profound Meaning of the Lotus Sūtra, “Just as water becomes salty when it flows into the sea, any wisdom ceases to exist in itself after it is taken in the True Wisdom.” Thus he instructs us that no original names be mentioned. People of the Tendai School generally maintain:

The pre-Lotus sūtras with the first four flavors, which were dismissed in comparing the Lotus Sūtra with other sūtras (relative subtlety), can be kept and any names of Buddhas and bodhisattvas can be recited even after the single path is revealed through the doctrine of absolute subtlety because these sūtras, Buddhas and bodhisattvas are included in the wonderful entity of the Lotus Sūtra. Waters in rivers before entering the sea differ in size, or in cleanliness, but once they flow into the ocean, we can see that it is a serious mistake to distinguish or select water saying that some waters are cleaner than others. Both the dirty water that is undesirable and clean water that is loved stem originally from the same ocean. Therefore, even when we put a special name on some water, water is water wherever it is taken out from, and it is a mistake to think that there is a difference in water. Likewise, it is not a terrible idea to believe in any teaching one likes or comes across.

Thus they accept and believe any teaching which comes to the mind such as the nembutsu and mantras.

When speaking in vague terms, a point of view such as this seems rational, but strictly speaking it is a serious fallacy leading to hell. The reason is that while one person who truly understands the doctrine of kaie may uphold various provisional sūtras or recite any names of the Buddhas and bodhisattvas, all other people generally keep or chant them with the usual prejudice without understanding the meaning of kaie. Consequently, such a view can be an evil teaching in which even if a person who understands the doctrine may get enlightened, most people will fall into hell. Any doctrines expounded in the pre-Lotus sūtras and the “ultimate truth” shown in those doctrines are all composed of biased thoughts and convictions. As stated in the second chapter, “Expedients,” of the Lotus Sūtra, “They are astray in the thick forest of wrong views on existence and non-existence.”

Then both those who know the doctrine of kaie and those who do not know it cannot avoid going down to hell if they uphold provisional sūtras and recite the names of the Buddhas and bodhisattvas in them and contemplate the “ultimate truth” of the expedient teachings. Those who are convinced that they know the doctrine of kaie are no less wrong than those who believe that it is possible to put the water of the ocean into a puddle made by a hoof of a cattle. How can they escape from falling into the Three Evil Realms (hell, the realm of hungry souls, and realm of beasts and birds)? What’s worse, those who do not know the doctrine of kaie, basically taking in wrong teachings, are so attached to the wrong views or expedient teachings that they are sure to fall into the Hell of Incessant Suffering. Even after realizing the doctrine of kaie, they should dismiss such ideas considering them expedient teachings with which enlightenment cannot be achieved. Do not recite or uphold the names and the “ultimate wisdom” of evil doctrines.

Shoshū Mondō-shō, Questions and Answers Regarding Other Schools, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 3, Page 179-181

This dilemma is especially important here in the United States, where – unlike Japan – there is no foundation of Buddhist understanding. Study is necessary to build that foundation. Or to put it in the context of the Lotus Sūtra, by studying the pre-Lotus sūtras we can correctly understand how these expedient teachings flowed into the ocean of the Lotus Sūtra.

Namu Myōhō Renge Kyō

Funeral Service

Ven. Kenjo Igarashi

When Rev. Igarashi has a big funeral service he invites me to help. Ten minutes before the start of the service I light the candles on the altar and light the charcoal for the powdered incense offering. Then, two minutes before the scheduled start, I strike the church bell, starting slowly and then progressively faster and then progressively slower until I conclude with two quick strikes.

Today’s service was for Masanao Okamoto, the husband of Fusako. Mr. Okamoto is a former president of the church board. His wife is very active in the church. The two met in the Tule Lake internment camp during World War II and were married in 1947. The couple had been married 71 years when Mr. Okamoto died.

The photo above captures Rev. Igarashi in quiet contemplation prior to the service in a small room adjacent to the altar.

Each time I help out at a funeral, Rev. Igarashi tells me the same thing. He doesn’t like funerals. In the 30 years he has been the chief priest at the Sacramento Nichiren Buddhist Church he’s done a lot of funerals. More and more often now the services are for men and women whom he has worked with for many years.

The Purpose of a Buddhist Practice

When I joined Nichiren Shoshu in 1989 I was given The Liturgy of Nichiren Shoshu booklet. Each day that I practiced I recited the silent prayer:

I pray to erase my negative karma created by my own past causes and to fulfill my wishes in this life and in the future.

And it was this focus on “my wishes” that eventually caused me to stumble and re-evaluate exactly what I thought was the purpose of a Buddhist Practice.

Recently I took up The Bodhicaryāvatāra, Śāntideva’s Guide to the Buddhist Path to Awakening. In the introduction by Kate Crosby and Andrew Skilton is an explanation of Mahāyāna Buddhism from the Bodhipathapradīpa (Lamp on the Path to Enlightenment) by Atiśa (982-1054). Atiśa’s explanation underscores just how superficial is a practice focused on “my wishes.”

Atiśa speaks of three ‘scopes,’ three aspirations which one might have when engaging in spiritual practice. The first and lowest aspiration is that of a person whose goal is purely within the realm of unenlightenment — religion for wealth, fame, or even a favorable future rebirth. This aspiration — if they were honest the aspiration of so many people — is not particularly Buddhist, although at least in its higher concern with future rebirths it is somewhat better than having no spiritual aspiration whatsoever. …

According to Atiśa the second and middling aspiration is that of one who turns his or her back on all concern with future pleasures and future rebirths (with their invariable attendant sufferings) and aims for freedom. The hallmark of this aspiration is renunciation, and the goal is enlightenment, understood as freedom from suffering and rebirth. …

In following this second middling scope the practitioner can attain freedom from rebirth, enlightenment. Such a person is called an arhat, a Worthy One. The goal is held to be a difficult one requiring intensive practice and great insight which will fuel the letting go, the deep renunciation which leads to freedom. Perhaps this was the main concern of serious Buddhist practitioners in the immediate centuries after the death of the Buddha. Yet from the Mahāyāna perspective, no matter how many of their fellows follow it, this is not the highest goal and its aspiration is not the supreme aspiration. There is something higher than simply attaining enlightenment, the state of an arhat, and that is the state of a Buddha himself. What characterizes a Buddha, the Mahāyāna urges, is not just great insight, supreme wisdom, but his (or sometimes her) immense compassion as well. Compassion for others is missing in the description of the second scope which leads to the enlightenment of the arhat. Atiśa adds that those of the third and highest scope wish in every way — even by means of their own sufferings — for the complete destruction of all the sufferings of others. In fact, so long as someone else is suffering the Mahāyāna practitioner cannot attain peace. Superior to the arhat is the bodhisattva, one who vows to attain perfect Buddhahood, the perfection of insight and compassion, for the benefit of all.

No, I’m not suggesting switching to Tibetan Buddhism. I believe that knowing the foundations of Buddhism is essential to knowing the Lotus Sūtra. As Nichiren wrote in Ichidai Shōgyō Tai-i, Outline of All the Holy Teachings of the Buddha, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 3, Pages 81:

The reason for my commentaries on the Four Teachings (Tripitaka, Common, Distinct, and Perfect) and the Four Periods (Flower Garland, Agama, Expanded, and Wisdom) is to help others learn what the Lotus Sūtra is. For one cannot correctly understand the teaching of the Lotus Sūtra without learning the pre-Lotus Sūtras, although one may study the pre-Lotus Sūtras without learning about other Sūtras.

In support of this, Grand Master T’ien-t’ai stated in his Profound Meaning of the Lotus Sūtra, “When attempting to spread various sūtras other than the Lotus Sūtra, the essential part of the teaching will not be lost even if a doctrinal analysis of all the teachings of the Buddha is not rendered. When attempting to spread the Lotus Sūtra, however, the essence of the teaching may be lost if a doctrinal analysis is not made.” It is preached in the Lotus Sūtra (chapter 2, “Expedients”), “Although the Buddhas expound various teachings, it is for the purpose of leading the people into the world of the One Buddha Vehicle.” “Various teachings” here refer to all the pre-Lotus Sūtras. “For the purpose of leading the people into the world of the One Buddha Vehicle” means to expound all the scriptures of Buddhism to reveal the Lotus Sūtra.

Practicing in Oakland

Temporary Nichiren Shu altar at the Bay Area Thelemic Temple. The Gohonzon was inscribed by the abbot of Minobu and given to Ryuei McCormick.
Got on Amtrak in Sacramento and took a ride to Oakland to attend the Nichiren Shu service and lecture put on my Rev. Ryuei McCormick. I’m writing this on the train ride back to Sacramento.

I met Ryuei McCormick back when I first switched to Nichiren Shu in 2015. I would attend Sunday services at Myokakuji Betsuin in San Jose occasionally. At the time, Ryuei McCormick was an assistant priest. Now he has his own Sangha in Oakland.

Ryuei McCormick is a scholar monk. Not sure he would agree with me, but that is how I describe his depth of understanding of the foundations of Buddhism. He has written a number of books. Among the ones I have here are Lotus Seeds: The Essence of Nichiren Shu Buddhism, Lotus World: An Illustrated Guide to the Gohonzon, and Lotus in a Sea of Flames, a biography of Nichiren Shonin.

I would take the long drive to San Jose more for his lectures than the actual service. Today’s hour-long lecture following the traditional Nichiren Shu service made me wish it were easier to attend his Oakland sangha events.

The journey isn’t the problem — easy Amtrak to Oakland, half-mile walk and return. Problem is really the conflicting service schedules between Sacramento and Oakland.

The view of the Suisun Bay Reserve Fleet from the train on the way to Oakland.

The easy walk from Amtrak’s Jack London Square station
The ride home

Home Again

Successfully made it from Churchville, NY, to Sacramento, CA, with stops in:

Portage, Indiana
Lincoln, Nebraska
Cheyenne, Wyoming.
Salt Lake City, Utah

The Altar, the Hedgehog and the Kitten

The last mobile altar. (See previous altars here and here.) Of all the places we’ve stayed on this trip, this is the low point. Strongly recommend against staying at the Ramada by Wyndham in Salt Lake City on 1659 West North Temple.

The wife has decided to skip our planned stay in Reno and drive back to Sacramento tomorrow. We’ll save more than $100, which will almost cover what we spent at The Emporium on Bridger in Rock Springs, Wyoming.

While I’ve sometimes considered my wife’s antique shopping on this trip less than helpful, I must admit that I’m really glad I tagged along on this venture.

Here are the two useless novelties that I just couldn’t live without.

The Kitten and the Hedgehog

The Kitten, which is made of assorted metal parts such as springs, horse shoes, nails and assorted odds and ends, was part of a collection of metal works by a local artist. I didn’t get the name.

The Hedgehog, however, I found out later is a Vintage Hedgehog Ashtray Set of 6 Nesting Ashtrays Metal Walter Bosse Style Mid Century.

The Light of the Dharma

Morning service in Lincoln, Nebraska
Evening service in Cheyenne, Wyoming.

Having fun with the variety of lamps on the desks in our hotel rooms. (See Portage, Indiana)