Two Buddhas, p93The “five periods” and other schemas of this kind represent remarkable achievements as efforts to systematize the Buddhist teachings into a coherent whole. However, text-critical scholarship has now made clear that they cannot be accepted as historically accurate. The Buddhist sūtras were compiled over a long period, and the Mahāyāna sūtras in particular were produced over several centuries, well after Śākyamuni’s passing. Nonetheless, it is vital to understand that for Nichiren and his Tendai forebears and contemporaries, the division of the teachings into “five periods” was, in fact, historical reality, a faithful account of how Śākyamuni Buddha had taught, and indeed, of how all buddhas proceed.
Category Archives: 2buddhas
Incorporating the Provisional in the One Vehicle
Two Buddhas, p72-73Zhiyi had taught that the Lotus Sūtra has the function of “opening and integrating” (J. kaie) the three vehicles within the one vehicle. … Nichiren understood this as opening the nine realms to reveal the buddha realm. But what did it mean in terms of practice? Nichiren’s contemporaries often freely combined copying and reciting the Lotus Sūtra with nenbutsu chanting, esoteric rituals, and other modes of Buddhist devotion. For many Tendai scholars of the day, the distinction between true and provisional teachings did not mean renouncing practices other than the Lotus Sūtra. It would indeed be a mistake, they said, to recite other sūtras or chant the names of the various buddhas and bodhisattvas thinking that these represented separate truths. But the one vehicle of the Lotus Sūtra integrates all other teachings within itself, just as the great ocean gathers all rivers. Therefore, they claimed, any practice — whether esoteric ritual performance, sūtra copying, or nenbutsu recitation — in effect becomes the practice of the Lotus Sūtra when carried out with this understanding. Others, however, disagreed, and none more vocally than Nichiren. To argue his point, he inverted the “rivers and ocean” metaphor. Once integrated into the Lotus Sūtra, he said, the nenbutsu, esoteric rites, and other practices lose their identity as independent practices, just as the many rivers emptying into the ocean assume the same salty flavor and lose their original names. Precisely because provisional teachings are integrated into the all encompassing principle of the one vehicle, they are no longer to be practiced as independent forms. At the same time, however, Nichiren insisted that the daimoku contains all truth and blessings within itself. Because the daimoku is all-encompassing, chanting it would confer all the benefits that the religious practices of his day were thought to produce: this-worldly benefits such as protection and healing, assurance for the afterlife, and buddhahood itself. His aim was not to eradicate the spectrum of religious interpretations, but to undercut their basis in other traditions and assimilate them to the Lotus Sūtra alone.
Shoju or Shakubuku
Two Buddhas, p86Buddhist sūtras specify two approaches to teaching the dharma: shōju, or leading others gradually without criticizing their present stance, and shakubuku, or actively rebuking attachment to false views. The choice between them, Nichiren said, should depend on the time and place. In his view, in Japan at the beginning of the Final Dharma age — a time and place where the Lotus Sūtra was being rejected in favor of provisional teachings — the confrontational shakubuku method should take precedence over the more accommodating shōju approach.
Then and Now
Two Buddhas, p32In the contemporary world, where the violence and suffering brought about by religious conflict are so starkly evident, Nichiren’s emphasis on the exclusive truth of the Lotus Sūtra and his assertive mode of proselytizing sometimes provoke antipathy, as they fly in the face of ideals of tolerance and religious pluralism. Both traditional temple organizations and long-established lay groups of Nichiren Buddhism tend to be more accommodating and to take a milder approach in spreading their teachings, in keeping with Nichiren’s admonition that the method of propagation should accord with the times. Nichiren, however, lived in a very different world, where his conviction of the Lotus Sūtra’s sole efficacy in the age of the Final Dharma demanded resolute opposition to other Buddhist forms. This stance sharply differentiated him from the Buddhist mainstream of his day. Though it drew hostility, it may well have enabled his fledgling community to survive beyond his lifetime by carving out a unique religious identity.
Preaching the Exclusive Truth of the Lotus Sūtra
Two Buddhas, p31-32For Nichiren, preaching the exclusive truth of the Lotus Sūtra was not only about leading individuals to enlightenment, but also about saving the country and establishing an ideal buddha land in this world, a task he came to see as his personal mission and responsibility. In declaring the supremacy of the Lotus Sūtra, he found it necessary to rebuke attachment to other, provisional teachings; in consequence, he encountered repeated antagonism. Nichiren was often beset by danger and privation. Out of this experience, he developed what might be called a soteriology of undergoing persecution. The Lotus Sūtra itself speaks of the hostility that will confront its devotees in a latter evil age. Nichiren and his followers therefore understood the persecutions they faced as both fulfilling the sūtra’s prophecies and confirming the veracity of their mission to propagate it. Nichiren also taught that to endure hardships and opposition in spreading faith in the Lotus Sūtra is to repay one’s debt to the Buddha, eradicate one’s past evil karma, fulfill the bodhisattva’s mandate to sacrifice even one’s life, if need be, to save others, and guarantee one’s future buddhahood. Indeed, one could say that Nichiren’s teaching on buddhahood has two temporal modes: immediately manifesting the all-encompassing buddha realm in the act of chanting the daimoku, and realizing buddhahood as an unfolding process in devoting oneself to the daimoku’s propagation.
Hōnen vs. Nichiren
Two Buddhas, p28-29Hōnen’s followers maintained one should set aside the Lotus in this lifetime and chant the nenbutsu instead, achieve birth in Amitābha’s pure land, and attain the awakening of the Lotus Sūtra there.
Nichiren fiercely opposed this argument. For him, Hōnen’s focus on human limitations ignored the Buddha’s own distinction between true and provisional teachings. The Lotus was the sūtra of which Śākyamuni himself had said, “For more than forty years I have expounded the dharma in all manner of ways through adeptness in skillful means, but the core truth has still not been revealed,” and, “Having openly set aside skillful means, I will teach only the highest path.”
Precisely because the Lotus Sūtra is profound, Nichiren argued, it can save even the most depraved individuals. He also maintained that the nenbutsu belonged to the lesser category of provisional Mahāyāna and did not represent the Buddha’s final intent. He likened it to the scaffolding erected in building a large stūpa: once the stūpa (the Lotus Sūtra) has been completed, the scaffolding (the nenbutsu) should be dismantled.
Like Hōnen, Nichiren taught a universally accessible mode of practice, grounded in faith and centered on the chanting of a single phrase. But despite these outward similarities, the doctrine and attitude underlying the two practices differ radically. Rather than promising enlightenment after death and in a distant realm, the daimoku as taught by Nichiren offers direct access to a dimension in which the self opens to pervade the universe, and buddhahood is realized “in this body.” In his teaching, mappō is accordingly revalorized as the moment when the “perfectly encompassing path” of immediate enlightenment becomes accessible to all.
Shōbō, Zōbō and Mappō
Two Buddhas, p26-27Buddhist sūtras suggest that as the world moved farther and farther away from the time of the historical Buddha, his teachings would be refracted through an increasingly flawed mode of understanding; people would grow ever more deluded and liberation would become harder to achieve. In East Asia, this decline was said to span three successive periods: the age of the True Dharma (shōbō), the age of the Semblance Dharma (zōbō), and the age of the Final Dharma (mappō). Although chronologies differed, a rough consensus in Japan held that the first two ages had lasted a thousand years each and that the Final Dharma age had begun in 1052.
From a scholarly perspective, mappō represents a discourse, not a historical reality. Buddhism in early medieval Japan was thriving: Buddhist institutions, learning, arts, and culture all flourished, and a wealth of new interpretations arose. Nonetheless, the idea that the age was in decline provided a ready explanation for political troubles and natural disasters; Buddhist teachers appropriated the idea of mappō in different ways to advance competing agendas. Some urged that because the times were degenerate, practitioners should be all the more conscientious in carrying out traditional Buddhist disciplines such as maintaining precepts, practicing meditation, and studying scriptures. Others, of whom Nichiren is one, drew on notions of mappō to legitimize innovations in Buddhist thought and practice.
Inherent Buddhahood
Two Buddhas, p26For Nichiren, the Lotus Sūtra alone fully revealed the inherence of the buddha realm in all nine realms of unenlightened beings: By chanting its title, Namu Myōhō-renge-kyō, which instantiates the wisdom of all buddhas, even the most deluded person, he said, can manifest the buddha realm directly. Nichiren likened this to fire being produced by a stone taken from beneath the depths of water or a lamp illuminating a place that has been dark for millions of years.
Where Hell and the Buddha Exist
Two Buddhas, p25-26Ichinen sanzen is a complex and challenging concept, and in his doctrinal instruction, Nichiren frequently concentrated on one of its key component principles: the mutual inclusion of the ten dharma realms (jikkai gogu). Traditional Buddhist cosmology divides saṃsāra or the realm of rebirth for unenlightened beings into a hierarchy of six paths: hell dwellers, hungry ghosts (preta), animals, demigods (asura), humans, and gods (deva). Above these, Tendai doctrine places four more realms characterized by ascending levels of awakening: the two realms of the śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas, who cultivate the aims of detachment and cessation of desire set forth in the so-called Hinayāna teachings, aiming for the goal of Nirvāṇa; bodhisattvas, who strive for the liberation of all beings; and fully realized buddhas. In contrast to the buddha realm, which represents enlightenment, the other nine realms represent various levels of delusion, or states not yet fully awakened. Being empty of fixed, independent existence, all ten interpenetrate, meaning that each realm contains all ten within itself. Specifically, this means that the Buddha and all living beings are not separate; the buddha realm does not exist apart from oneself. Nichiren explains this in simple terms: “As to where hell and the Buddha exist: some sūtras say that hell lies beneath the ground, while others say that the Buddha dwells in the west. But close investigation shows that both exist within our five-foot body. For hell is in the heart of a man who despises his father and makes light of his mother, just as flowers and fruit are already present within the lotus seed. What we call ‘buddha’ dwells in our mind, in the same way that stones contain fire and that jewels have value intrinsically.”
True vs. Provisional
Two Buddhas, p24-25Nichiren saw the Lotus Sūtra as all-encompassing, containing the whole of Buddhist truth within itself. All other sūtras reveal but partial aspects of that truth. Or, in Tendai terminology, the Lotus Sūtra is “true,” while all other sūtras are “provisional.” What this meant for Nichiren in practical terms was that the Lotus Sūtra alone enables all persons without exception to become buddhas. Nichiren grounded this claim in the “three thousand realms in a single thought-moment” (ichinen sanzen) a principle first articulated by Zhiyi. … In essence, this principle means that at each moment the smallest phenomenon (“a single thought-moment”) and the entire cosmos (“three thousand realms”) mutually pervade and encompass one another. Where Zhiyi had introduced this idea only briefly, Nichiren developed it as the very foundation of his thought.